Metal hardmask compositions

ABSTRACT

The invention provides a composition comprising at least the following A and B:
         A) a polymer comprising, in polymerized from, at least one “monomer that comprises at least one hydroxyl group;” and   B) an organometal compound comprising at least one metal selected from Ti, Zr, Hf, Co, Mn, Zn, or combinations thereof, and wherein the organometal compound is present in an amount greater than 5 weight percent, based on the sum weight of A and B.

REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims the benefit of U.S. ProvisionalApplication No. 61/607,035, filed Mar. 6, 2012.

BACKGROUND

With the continuous decrease in both critical dimension (CD) and pitchin “193 nm immersion lithography,” the use of a hardmask in certainlayers of integrated circuit (IC) fabrication has become popular, owingto the excellent etch selectivity of the hardmask materials. Among thedifferent hardmask approaches in recent years, metal hardmasks, such asTiN hardmask, are applied, using chemical vapor deposition (CVD), onto aprocessed wafer. Amorphous carbon hardmask, applied through either CVDor a spin-on technique, and silicon hardmask (or silicon antireflectivecoating or SiARC) are among the conventional technologies in ICfabrication. A spin-on, mixed metal hardmask (SOMMH) is now gaining itsattraction in the IC industry, in part due to an attempt to replace theCVD metal hardmask for cost reduction and for simplification offabrication processes. From a fabrication point of view, SOMMH is alsobelieved to be able to replace SiARC in an IC fabrication scheme,especially when the substrate, to which patterns are to be transferred,is a silicon oxide dielectric material.

Hybrid metal (or organometal) nano-particles have gained theirpopularity in recent years. These organo metal nano-particles are usedin polymer matrices for achieving certain physical/chemical properties,including increased refractive index and enhanced thermal stability. Inthese applications, a silsesquioxane-titanate hybrid polymer system foranti-reflective coating was first discussed by Chen, as early as in 2004(see Chen et al., Material Chemistry and Physics, 83 (2004), 71-77).Non-bonded titanates in silsesquioxane matrix are described in U.S. Pat.No. 5,100,503. A silsesquioxane matrix bonded to titanates with sizesless than, or equal to, 5 nm are disclosed in WO 2007/053396. However,there remains a need for new hardmask compositions that can be used toform a SOMMH film with a high cross-link density and with excellentsolvent resistance. These needs and others have been met by thefollowing invention.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The invention provides a composition comprising at least the following Aand B:

A) a polymer comprising, in polymerized from, at least one “monomer thatcomprises at least one hydroxyl group;” and

B) an organometal compound comprising at least one metal selected fromTi, Zr, Hf, Co, Mn, Zn, or combinations thereof, and wherein theorganometal compound is present in an amount greater than 5 weightpercent, based on the sum weight of A and B.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A and 1B depict, at different curing temperatures, filmthickness, before and after PGMEA striping (90 sec single puddle), andafter a post strip bake (Ex. 1 shown in 1A, and Ex. 2 shown in 1B. InFIGS. 1A and 1B, for each set of bars, at each cure temperature, theindividual bars from left to right are as follows: initial, post strip,and post strip bake.

FIG. 2 depicts the “refractive index versus curing temperature” for Ex.1 and Ex. 2. In FIG. 2, for each set of bars, at each cure temperature,the individual bars from left to right are as follows: Ex. 1 and Ex. 2.

FIG. 3 depicts, for Ex. 3, at two different curing temperatures, filmthickness, before and after PGMEA striping (90 sec single puddle), andafter a post strip bake. In FIG. 3, for each set of bars, at each curetemperature, the individual bars from left to right are as follows:initial, post strip, and post strip bake.

FIG. 4 depicts, for Ex. 3, at two different curing temperatures, filmthickness, before PGMEA striping (90 sec single puddle), and an afterpost strip bake. A post coating bake at 105° C. was inserted into theprocess flow. In FIG. 4, for each set of bars, at each cure temperature,the individual bars from left to right are as follows: initial, and poststrip bake.

FIGS. 5A-5C, at different curing temperatures, depict film thicknessbefore and after solvent strip and after strip bake. FIG. 5A—Ex. 10,FIG. 5B—Ex. 11, and FIG. 5C—Ex. 12. In FIGS. 5A-5C, for each set ofbars, at each cure temperature, the individual bars from left to rightare as follows: before strip, after strip, and after strip bake.

FIG. 6 depicts refractive indices of cured films (Ex. 10) at differentcuring temperatures.

FIG. 7 depicts refractive indices of coated films at different levels oforganometal (TYZOR AA-105).

FIG. 8 depicts overlaid “CD through dose” plots for original dual BARCstack and the stack with Ex. 11 metal hardmask.

FIG. 9 depicts “CD through dose” for original dual BARC (top) and forthe stack with Ex. 11 as the bottom BARC (bottom).

FIG. 10. depicts “42 nm/84 nm” pitch lines. Left: with original dualBRAC stack. Right: the stack with Ex. 11 as the bottom B ARC.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As discussed above, the invention provides a composition comprising atleast the following A and B:

A) a polymer comprising, in polymerized from, at least one “monomer thatcomprises at least one hydroxyl group;” and

B) an organometal compound comprising at least one metal selected fromTi, Zr, Hf, Co, Mn, Zn, or combinations thereof, and wherein theorganometal compound is present in an amount greater than 5 weightpercent, based on the sum weight of A and B.

An inventive composition may comprise a combination of two or moreembodiments as described herein.

The polymer of component A may comprise a combination of two or moreembodiments as described herein.

The organometal compound of component B may comprise a combination oftwo or more embodiments as described herein.

The “monomer that comprises at least one hydroxyl group;” may comprise acombination of two or more embodiments as described herein.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound is present in an amountgreater than 10 weight percent, based on the sum weight of A and B.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound is present in an amountgreater than 20 weight percent, based on the sum weight of A and B.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound is present in an amountgreater than 50 weight percent, based on the sum weight of A and B.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound is present in an amountgreater than 75 weight percent, based on the sum weight of A and B.

In one embodiment, the polymer of component A comprises less than 1weight percent silicon, based on the weight of the polymer.

In one embodiment, the polymer of component A comprises less than 0.5weight percent silicon, based on the weight of the polymer.

In one embodiment, the polymer of component A comprises less than 0.1weight percent silicon, based on the weight of the polymer.

In one embodiment, the polymer of component A comprises less than 0.05weight percent silicon, based on the weight of the polymer.

In one embodiment, component A is present in an amount greater than 20weight percent, based sum weight of A and B.

In one embodiment, component A is present in an amount greater than 50weight percent, based sum weight of A and B.

In one embodiment, component B is present in an amount less than 80weight percent, based sum weight of A and B.

In one embodiment, the polymer of component A comprises from 5 to 100weight percent of the “monomer that comprises at least one hydroxylgroup” based on the weight of the polymer.

In one embodiment, the “monomer that comprises at least one hydroxylgroup,” of the polymer of component A, is selected from HEMA,OH-styrene, or combinations thereof.

In one embodiment, the “monomer that comprises at least one hydroxylgroup,” of the polymer of component A, is selected from a hydroxyacrylate monomer or a hydroxy alkyl acrylate monomer.

In one embodiment, the “monomer that comprises at least one hydroxylgroup,” of the polymer of component A, is selected from OH-acrylate,OH-methacrylate, or OH-ethacrylate.

In one embodiment, the polymer of component A further comprises anacrylate monomer or an alkyl acrylate monomer.

In one embodiment, the polymer of component A further comprises anacrylate, a methacrylate, or an ethacrylate.

In one embodiment, the polymer of component A has a molecular weightdistribution less than, or equal to, 4.0, or less than, or equal to,3.5, or less than, or equal to, 3.0.

In one embodiment, the polymer of component A has a molecular weightdistribution greater than, or equal to, 1.1, or greater than, or equalto, 1.5, or greater than, or equal to, 1.7.

In one embodiment, the polymer of component A has a number averagemolecular weight (Mn) less than, or equal to 15000 g/mole, or less than,or equal to, 12000 g/mole, or less than, or equal to, 10000 g/mole.

In one embodiment, the polymer of component A has a number averagemolecular weight (Mn) greater than, or equal to, 4000 g/mole, or greaterthan, or equal to, 5000 g/mole, or greater than, or equal to, 6000g/mole.

In one embodiment, the polymer of component A has a weight averagemolecular weight (Mw) less than, or equal to 35000 g/mole, or less than,or equal to, 30000 g/mole, or less than, or equal to, 25000 g/mole.

In one embodiment, the polymer of component A has a weight averagemolecular weight (Mw) greater than, or equal to, 7000 g/mole, or greaterthan, or equal to, 7500 g/mole, or greater than, or equal to, 8000g/mole.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound is chelated with at leasttwo oxygen atoms.

In one embodiment, organometal compound comprises a metal selected fromTi, Zr, Hf, Co, Mn or Zn.

In one embodiment, organometal compound comprises a metal selected fromTi, Zr, or combinations thereof.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound comprises a metal selectedfrom Ti or Zr.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound is selected from thefollowing compounds:

or combinations thereof, and

wherein R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7 and R8 are each independentlyselected from the following:

-   -   i) hydrocarbon group,    -   ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group,    -   iii) a hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatom in        its backbone, or    -   iv) a substituted hydrocarbon group containing at least one        heteroatom in its backbone; and

wherein R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19 and R20 areeach independently selected from the following:

i) a hydrogen atom,

ii) a hydrocarbon group,

iii) a substituted hydrocarbon group,

iv) a hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatom in itsbackbone, or

v) a substituted hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatom inits backbone.

In one embodiment, for compounds T1, Z1 and Z2, the R1, R2, R3, R4, R5,R6, R7 and R8 are each independently selected from the following:

-   -   i) hydrocarbon group, or    -   ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group; and

wherein R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19 and R20 areeach independently selected from the following:

i) a hydrogen atom,

ii) a hydrocarbon group.

In one embodiment, for compounds T1, Z1 and Z2, the R1, R2, R3, R4, R5,R6, R7 and R8 are each independently selected from the following:

-   -   i) hydrocarbon group; and

wherein R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19 and R20 areeach independently selected from the following:

i) a hydrogen atom,

ii) a hydrocarbon group.

In one embodiment, for compounds T1, Z1 and Z2, the R1, R2, R3, R4, R5,R6, R7 and R8 are each independently selected from the following:

-   -   i) hydrocarbon group; and

wherein R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19 and R20 areeach independently selected from the following:

-   -   ii) a hydrocarbon group.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound is selected from thefollowing compounds:

or combinations thereof; andwherein R5, R6, R7, R8, R21, R22, R23 and R24 are each independentlyselected from the following:

i) a hydrocarbon group,

ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group,

iii) a hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatom in itsbackbone, or

iv) a substituted hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatomin its backbone. In a further embodiment, R5, R6, R7, R8, R21, R22, R23and R24 are each independently selected from the following: i) ahydrocarbon group, or ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group. In a furtherembodiment, R5, R6, R7, R8, R21, R22, R23 and R24 are each independentlyselected from the following: i) a hydrocarbon group.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound is selected from thefollowing compounds:

-   -   wherein R5, R6, R7, R8, R21, R22, R23 and R24 are each        independently selected from the following:

i) a hydrocarbon group,

ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group,

iii) a hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatom in itsbackbone, or

iv) a substituted hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatomin its backbone. In a further embodiment, R5, R6, R7, R8, R21, R22, R23and R24 are each independently selected from the following: i) ahydrocarbon group, or ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group. In a furtherembodiment, R5, R6, R7, R8, R21, R22, R23 and R24 are each independentlyselected from the following: i) a hydrocarbon group.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound is selected from thefollowing compounds:

or combinations thereof;

wherein R21, R22, R23 and R24 are each independently selected from thefollowing:

i) a hydrocarbon group,

ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group,

iii) a hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatom in itsbackbone, or

iv) a substituted hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatomin its backbone. In a further embodiment, R21, R22, R23 and R24 are eachindependently selected from the following: i) a hydrocarbon group, orii) a substituted hydrocarbon group. In a further embodiment, R21, R22,R23 and R24 are each independently selected from the following: i) ahydrocarbon group.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound is selected from thefollowing compounds:

wherein R21, R22, R23 and R24 are each independently selected from thefollowing:

i) a hydrocarbon group,

ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group,

iii) a hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatom in itsbackbone, or

iv) a substituted hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatomin its backbone. In a further embodiment, R21, R22, R23 and R24 are eachindependently selected from the following: i) a hydrocarbon group, orii) a substituted hydrocarbon group. In a further embodiment, R21, R22,R23 and R24 are each independently selected from the following: i) ahydrocarbon group.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound is selected from thefollowing compounds:

wherein R21 and R22 are each independently selected from the following:

i) a hydrocarbon group,

ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group,

iii) a hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatom in itsbackbone, or

iv) a substituted hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatomin its backbone. In a further embodiment, R21 and R22 are eachindependently selected from the following: i) a hydrocarbon group, orii) a substituted hydrocarbon group. In a further embodiment, R21 andR22 are each independently selected from the following: i) a hydrocarbongroup.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound is selected from thefollowing compounds:

wherein R23 and R24 are each independently selected from the following:

i) a hydrocarbon group,

ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group,

iii) a hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatom in itsbackbone, or

iv) a substituted hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatomin its backbone. In a further embodiment, R23 and R24 are eachindependently selected from the following: i) a hydrocarbon group, orii) a substituted hydrocarbon group. In a further embodiment, R23 andR24 are each independently selected from the following: i) a hydrocarbongroup.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound is selected from thefollowing compounds:

wherein R5, R6, R7 and R8 are each independently selected from thefollowing:

i) a hydrocarbon group,

ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group,

iii) a hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatom in itsbackbone, or

iv) a substituted hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatomin its backbone. In a further embodiment, R5, R6, R7 and R8 are eachindependently selected from the following: i) a hydrocarbon group, orii) a substituted hydrocarbon group. In a further embodiment, R5, R6, R7and R8 are each independently selected from the following: i) ahydrocarbon group.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound is selected from thefollowing compounds: T2, Z2, or combinations thereof; and

wherein R21, R22, R5, R6, R7 and R8 are each independently selected fromthe following:

i) a hydrocarbon group,

ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group,

iii) a hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatom in itsbackbone, or

iv) a substituted hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatomin its backbone. In a further embodiment, R21, R22, R5, R6, R7 and R8are each independently selected from the following: i) a hydrocarbongroup, or ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group. In a further embodiment,R21, R22, R5, R6, R7 and R8 are each independently selected from thefollowing: i) a hydrocarbon group.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound is selected from thefollowing compounds: T2, or Z2; and

wherein R21, R22, R5, R6, R7 and R8 are each independently selected fromthe following:

i) a hydrocarbon group,

ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group,

iii) a hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatom in itsbackbone, or

iv) a substituted hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatomin its backbone. In a further embodiment, R21, R22, R5, R6, R7 and R8are each independently selected from the following: i) a hydrocarbongroup, or ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group. In a further embodiment,R21, R22, R5, R6, R7 and R8 are each independently selected from thefollowing: i) a hydrocarbon group.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound is selected from thefollowing compounds: Z3, Z2, or combinations thereof; and

wherein R23, R24, R5, R6, R7 and R8 are each independently selected fromthe following:

i) a hydrocarbon group,

ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group,

iii) a hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatom in itsbackbone, or

iv) a substituted hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatomin its backbone. In a further embodiment, R23, R24, R5, R6, R7 and R8are each independently selected from the following: i) a hydrocarbongroup, or ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group. In a further embodiment,R22, R24, R5, R6, R7 and R8 are each independently selected from thefollowing: i) a hydrocarbon group.

In one embodiment, the organometal compound is selected from thefollowing compounds: Z3, or Z2; and

wherein R23, R24, R5, R6, R7 and R8 are each independently selected fromthe following:

i) a hydrocarbon group,

ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group,

iii) a hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatom in itsbackbone, or

iv) a substituted hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatomin its backbone. In a further embodiment, R23, R24, R5, R6, R7 and R8are each independently selected from the following: i) a hydrocarbongroup, or ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group. In a further embodiment,R23, R24, R5, R6, R7 and R8 are each independently selected from thefollowing: i) a hydrocarbon group.

In one embodiment, the composition has a refractive index greater than,or equal to, 1.60, at 673 nm wavelength, after the composition isthermally annealed at 350° C. for 60 seconds. The refractive index canbe measured with a THERMA-WAVE Spectroscopic Ellipsometer (Model 7341),at 673 nm wavelength, by assuming k=0 (zero absorbance at 673 nmwavelength).

An inventive composition may comprise a combination of two or moreembodiments as described herein.

The invention also provides a chelated metal compound formed from aninventive composition, and comprising at least one ligand derived fromthe polymer of component A.

The invention also provides an article comprising at least one componentformed from an inventive composition.

In one embodiment, the article is an electronic device.

In one embodiment, the article is an LED encapsulant.

In one embodiment, the article is an optical fiber cladding.

In one embodiment, the article is a metal hardmask.

The invention also provides a film comprising at least one layer formedfrom an inventive composition. In a further embodiment, the film is ametal hardmask.

In one embodiment, the film comprises at least two layers. In a furtherembodiment, one layer is formed from an inventive composition, and theother layer is formed from another composition comprising at least onepolymer.

The invention also provides a film comprising at least two layers, andwherein at least one layer is an anti-reflective layer formed from aninventive composition. In a further embodiment, the other layer is aphotoresist layer.

An inventive article may comprise a combination of two or moreembodiments as described herein.

An inventive film may comprise a combination of two or more embodimentsas described herein.

The invention also provides a method of forming a coated substrate, saidmethod comprising at least the following:

a) applying an inventive composition over at least a portion of thesubstrate, and

b) thermally treating (for example, applying heat) the composition toform the coating.

In one embodiment, the coating is a hardmask layer.

The invention also provides a method of forming a coating on asubstrate, said method comprising at least the following:

applying an inventive composition over at least a portion of thesubstrate, or over one or more intermediate layers applied over saidsubstrate, and

thermally treating (for example, applying heat) the inventivecomposition to form the coating. In a further embodiment, multiplelayers of the inventive composition are applied over at least a portionof the substrate, or over one or more intermediate layers applied oversaid substrate.

In one embodiment, the coating is a hardmask layer.

An inventive method may comprise a combination of two or moreembodiments as described herein.

When used in an IC fabrication, a SOMMH is preferred to function as abottom antireflective coating (BARC), either being used alone, or alongwith another BARC, to form a BARC stack. In either situation, a SOMMHshould yield a desirable lithography performance to meet lithographyspecifications, as characterized by, for example, energy latitude (EL),depth of focus (DOE), line width roughness (LWR), line edge roughness(LER), pattern collapse margin (PCM), in addition to a good featureprofile.

Although organometal compound can aggregate by forming —O-M-O-M-O— bondsat a high curing temperature, molecular organometals, in general, do notform a uniform film in a spin coating process. Moreover, vaporization(or sublimation) of an organometal in a coated film during curing bakecould post a serious concern. However, it has been discover that theinvention compositions are excellent binder materials in SOMMHformulations. It was also discovered that the inventive compositionshave excellent thermal stability, for example, in terms of filmthickness shrinkage.

It has also been discovered that the inventive compositions, whenthermally treated at high temperatures (for example, 350° C.) form curedfilms that can be effectively removed with commercially availablecleaning solutions, such as SC-1 and Piranha.

The inventive compositions can be used in multi-layered coatings, forexample, tri-layer resists, which typically comprise the following: (a)a curable underlayer composition on a substrate; (b) a hardmaskcomposition (for example, a hardmask layer formed from an inventivecomposition described herein) applied above the curable composition; and(c) a photoresist composition layer applied above the hard maskcomposition. Coating compositions and lithographic processes aredescribed in U.S. Publication 2007/0238052 and U.S. Publication2009/0148789, each incorporated herein by reference.

The inventive compositions can be used to replace the following: CVDSiON, CVD low-temperature TEOS or oxide for quad layer application,and/or CVD HM in litho-etch-litho-etch double patterning.

DEFINITIONS

The term “composition,” as used herein, includes a mixture of materialswhich comprise the composition, as well as reaction products anddecomposition products formed from the materials of the composition.

The term “polymer,” as used herein, refers to a polymeric compoundprepared by polymerizing monomers, whether of the same or a differenttype. The generic term polymer thus embraces the term homopolymer(employed to refer to polymers prepared from only one type of monomer,with the understanding that trace amounts of impurities can beincorporated into the polymer structure), and the term interpolymer asdefined hereinafter.

The term “interpolymer,” as used herein, refers to polymers prepared bythe polymerization of at least two different types of monomers. Thegeneric term interpolymer includes copolymers (employed to refer topolymers prepared from two different monomers), and polymers preparedfrom more than two different types of monomers.

The term “substituted hydrocarbon,” as used herein refers to ahydrocarbon with one or more of the hydrogens substituted with anothergroup, such as, for example, a halogen (such as chlorine or bromine), orother group of atoms, such as, for example, —OH, —CN, —SH, —SO3H.

The terms “comprising,” “including,” “having,” and their derivatives,are not intended to exclude the presence of any additional component,step or procedure, whether or not the same is specifically disclosed. Inorder to avoid any doubt, all compositions claimed through use of theterm “comprising” may include any additional additive, adjuvant, orcompound, whether polymeric or otherwise, unless stated to the contrary.In contrast, the term, “consisting essentially of” excludes from thescope of any succeeding recitation any other component, step, orprocedure, excepting those that are not essential to operability. Theterm “consisting of” excludes any component, step, or procedure notspecifically delineated or listed.

Test Methods Measurement of Molecular Weight by GPC

Molecular weight of the prepolymer was monitored by Gel Permeation

Chromatography (GPC), also referred to as Size Exclusion Chromatography(SEC). The instrument was equipped with a set of columns appropriate formeasuring molecular weights in the range of about 500 g/mole to at leastabout 100,000 g/mole, based on polystyrene calibration standards. Fourcolumns installed series, “SHODEX LF-805, 804, 803 and 802 GPC columns,”8 mm diameter×300 mm length, available from Thomson Instrument Co., wereused in each analysis. All four columns were maintained at 30° C. Themobile phase was tetrahydrofuran (THF), and it was pumped at a rate of 1mL/min Injection volume was 100 microliter. The instrument was alsoequipped with a refractive index detector. Calibration was done usingpolystyrene standards with narrow MWDs, available from Polymer StandardsService GmbH, Mainz, Germany. The Mn, Mw, and MWD were calculated usingENPOWER GPC software available from WATERS.

Experimental I. Reagents A. Binder Polymers (Component A)

Please note the following abbreviations:

HEMA=2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate,

MMA=Methyl methacrylate,

tBA=tert-Butylacrylate, and

IPGMA=(2,2-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)methyl methyacrylate.

The chemical structures of these monomers are shown below. From left toright: HEMA, MMA, tBA, and IPGMA.

1) Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (soluble in HBM)

2) 30/70(w) HEMA/MMA (soluble in PGMEA or HBM)

3) 30/70(w) HEMA/tBA (soluble in all four solvents, HMB, PGMEA, MIBC,and 2-methyl-1-butanol)

4) 30/70(w) HEMA/IPGMA (soluble in all four solvents, HMB, PGMEA, MIBC,and 2-methyl-1-butanol)

B. Organometal Compounds (Component B)

1) TYZOR AA-105 available from DORF KETAL.

2) AA-105-IPG—see below.

3) Zirconium butoxide available from ALF AESAR (a Johnson MattheyCompany).

C. Solvents

1) Propylene glycol methylether acetate (PGMEA, by 146° C.)

2) Methyl-2,3-hydroxyisobutyrate (HBM, by 137° C.)

3) 4-Methyl-2-pentanol (MIBC, by 132° C.)

4) 2-Methyl-1-butanol (bp 129° C.)

D. Thermal Acid Generator

Triethylammonium 4-Methylbenzenesulfonate (TEA pTS)—see below.

II. Syntheses of Binder Polymers (Component A)

A) 30/70(w) HEMA/MMA

Preparation of a “60 g (polymer) batch” of “30/70(w) HEMA/MMA.”

Monomer/Initiator Feeding Solution

To a suitable container (a glass bottle), the following materials wereadded: 18.0 g HEMA, 42.0 g MMA and 30.0 g PGMEA (propylene glycolmethylether acetate) solvent. The container was capped, and gentlyshaken to mix all components. The container was then placed in an icebath, to equilibrate the temperature of the container with the bathtemperature. An initiator (1.8 g of V-601 initiator) was then added tothe container. The container was removed from the ice bath, and shakento completely dissolve the initiator, and then placed back into the icebath. The initiator, V-601, is dimethyl-2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionate)available from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.

Polymerization

The reactor was a 250 ml, 3-neck, round bottom flask, equipped with acondenser and a thermal couple, and connected to a feeding line for themonomer/initiator solution (prepared above). The thermal couple wasused, in conjunction with a controlled heating mantle, to monitor andcontrol the solution temperature in the reactor. The contents of thereactor were stirred with a magnetic stir bar.

The reactor was charge with “30.0 g PGMEA,” and the reactor temperaturewas increased and equilibrated at 99° C. (±2° C.) with adequateagitation. The monomer/initiator solution (prepared above) was fed intothe reactor at 99° C., at feeding rate of 250 μl/13 sec, using aHAMILTON dual syringe pump. The total feeding time was approximately 90minutes. After completion of this feed, the reactor temperature was heldat 99° C. for an additional two hours, and then the reaction flask wasremove from the heating mantle, and allowed to cool naturally to roomtemperature. Approximately “90 g of PGMEA” was added to the reactorpolymer to obtain a uniform solution after stirring. The polymersolution in the reactor was used “as is,” without further purification.The percent solid content of the polymer in the solution was determinedusing a “weight loss method.” In this method, approximately “0.1 g ofthe polymer solution” was weighted into an aluminum pan, andapproximately “0.6 g acetone” was added to dilute the solution and topromote an even coating at the bottom of the pan. The pan (pluscontents) was placed in a thermal oven, equilibrated at approximately110° C., and the pan (plus contents) was thermally treated for 15minutes. The final polymer solution contained approximately 28 wt %polymer, based on the weight of the polymer solution.

B) 30/70(w) HEMA/tBA in PGMEA

A “30/70(w) HEMA/tBA” polymer was prepared using a similar method asdiscussed above for was used for “30/70(w) HEMA/MMA,” except “42.0 g ofMMA” was replaced with “42.0 g tBA” in the monomer/initiator solution. A“60 g batch of the polymer” was prepared with approximately 49 wt %polymer in solution, as determined using the “weight loss method.

C) 30/70(w) HEMA/tBA in MIBC

A “30/70(w) HEMA/tBA” polymer was prepared using a similar method asdiscussed above for B), except for the following changes:

i) MIBC was used as a solvent to replace PGMEA, and

ii) the reactor was charged with “60 g of MIBC” instead of “30 g PGMEA.”

A polymer solution with approximately 40 wt % polymer was obtained, asdetermined using the “weight loss method.

D) 30/70(w) HEMA/IPGMA

A synthesis method, similar to the one for “30/70(w) HEMA/MMA,” wasused, except for the following differences.

i) The reactor temperature was maintained at 70° C. during the additionof the monomer solution, and was maintained at 70° C. for an additionaltwo hours after completion of the addition of the monomer solution.

ii) The initiator (4.2 g of v-601 initiator) was added to the reactor(at 70° C.), at once, as an approximately “30 wt % solution in PGMEA,”and the temperature of the reactor was allowed to come back to 70° C.,before the addition of the monomer solution into the reactor.

iii) An ice batch was not used in this polymerization. The monomersolution was maintained at room temperature during its addition to thereaction flask.

A “60 g batch of the polymer” was prepared. A polymer solution withapproximately 50 wt % polymer was obtained, as determined using the“weight loss method.

E) Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)

Preparation of a “30 g batch of the polymer” of poly(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate).

Monomer/Initiator Feeding Solution

To a suitable container (a glass bottle), the following materials wereadded: 30.0 g HEMA and 15.0 g HBM solvent. The container was capped, andgently shaken to mix all components. The container was then placed in anice bath, to equilibrate the temperature of the container with the bathtemperature. An initiator (0.9 g of V-601 initiator) was then added tothe container. The container was removed from the ice bath, and shakento completely dissolve the initiator, and then placed back into the icebath.

Polymerization

The reactor was a 250 ml, 3-neck, round bottom flask, equipped with acondenser and a thermal couple, and connected to a feeding line for themonomer/initiator solution (prepared above). The thermal couple wasused, in conjunction with a controlled heating mantle, to monitor andcontrol the solution temperature in the reactor. The contents of thereactor were stirred with a magnetic stir bar.

The reactor was charge with “15.0 g HBM,” and the reactor temperaturewas increased and equilibrated at 99° C. (±2° C.) with adequateagitation. The monomer/initiator solution (prepared above) was fed intothe reactor, at 99° C., at feeding rate of 250 μl/26 sec, using aHAMILTON dual syringe pump. The total feeding time was approximately 90minutes. After completion of this feed, the reactor temperature was heldat 99° C. for an additional two hours, and then the reaction flask wasremove from the heating mantle, and allowed to cool naturally to roomtemperature. Approximately “140 g of PGMEA” was added to the reactorpolymer to obtain a uniform solution after stirring. The polymersolution in the reactor was used “as is,” without further purification.The percent solid content of the polymer in the solution was determinedusing the “weight loss method,” as discussed above. The final polymersolution contained approximately 15 wt % polymer, based on the weight ofthe polymer solution.

Molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of these polymers(except HEMA homopolymer) were determined using the aforementioned GPCmethod, and are summarized in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1 Molecular Weights and Molecular Weight Distributions BinderPolymers Mw Mn PDI 30/70 (w) HEMA/MMA 16526 8335 1.98 30/70 (w) HEMA/tBAin PGMEA 16233 6624 2.45 30/70 (w) HEMA/tBA in MIBC 8283 4167 1.99 30/70(w) HEMA/IPGMA 21115 7234 2.92

III. Preparation of Metal Hardmask Formulations

Each polymer solution was used “as is’ from the polymerization, orfurther diluted with additional solvent used as the polymerizationsolvent.

30/70 HEMA/MMA polymer solution: 10.0 wt % polymer in PGMEA

30/70 HEMA/tBA polymer solution: 10.0 wt % polymer in PGMEA

30/70 HEMA/tBA polymer solution: 39.8 wt % polymer in MIBC

30/70 HEMA/IPGMA polymer solution: 10.0 wt % polymer in PGMEA.

Poly(HEMA) polymer solution: 14.7 wt % polymer in methyl-2-hydroxyisobutyrate (HBM).

TYZOR AA-105 organometal solution: 10.0 wt % organometal in PGMEA.

TYZOR AA-105 organometal solution: 20.0 wt % organometal in PGMEA.

TYZOR AA-105 organometal solution: 10.0 wt % organometal in HBM.

TYZOR AA-105 organometal solution: 25.0 wt % organometal in2-methyl-1-butanol.

Zirconium butoxide organometal solution: 25.0 wt % organometal in PGMEAand 1-Butanol

AA-105-IPG organometal solution: 10.0 wt % organometal in PGMEA.

TAG Solution=TEA pTS stock solution: 5.0 wt % thermal acid generator inHBM.

The hardmask formulations were prepared under ambient conditions. Eachformulation was prepared by mixing the corresponding stock solutions andsolvent(s) in a suitable container (glass vial) with the followingaddition order: 1) polymer solution, 2) solvent, 3) organometalsolution, and optionally 4) TAG solution. The following (Tables 2-1 to2-7) provide a summary of the formulations.

TABLE 2-1 Metal Hardmask Formulations Based on 30/70 (w) HEMA/MMA binderpolymer and TYZOR AA-105 30/70 (w) HEMA/MMA TYZOR AA-105 PGMEA Examples10.0 wt % in PGMEA 10.0 wt % in PGMEA Solvent Ex. 1 2.0 g 2.0 g 16.0 gEx. 2 1.0 g 3.0 g 16.0 g Ex. 3 1.5 g 4.5 g  4.0 g

TABLE 2-2 Metal Hardmask Formulations Based on 30/70 (w) HEMA/tBA BinderPolymer and TYZOR AA-105 30/70 (w) TAG HEMA/tBA TYZOR AA-105 TEA pTS10.0 wt % in 10.0 wt % 5 wt % PGMEA Examples PGMEA in PGMEA in HBMSolvent Ex. 4 2.25 g 6.75 g 0  6.0 g Ex. 5 2.25 g 6.75 g 1.44 g 4.56 g

TABLE 2-3 Metal Hardmask Formulation Based on Poly(HEMA) Binder Polymerand TYZOR AA-105 Poly(HEMA) TYZOR AA-105 HBM Examples 14.7 wt % in HBM10.0 wt % in HBM Solvent Ex. 6 1.531 g 6.750 g 6.720 g

TABLE 2-4 Metal Hardmask Formulation Based on 30/70 (w) HEMA/IPGMABinder Polymer and TYZOR AA-105 30/70 TAG HEMA/IPGMA TYZOR AA-105AA-105-IPG TEA pTS 10.0 wt % 10.0 wt % 10.0 wt % 5 wt % PGMEA Examplesin PGMEA in PGMEA in PGMEA in HBM solvent Ex. 7 2.250 g 0 6.750 g 1.440g 4.56 g Ex. 8 2.250 g 6.750 g 0 1.440 g 4.56 g

TABLE 2-5 Metal Hardmask Formulation Based on 30/70 HEMA/MMA BinderPolymer and Zirconium Butoxide Organometal Zirconium butoxide 30/70HEMA/MMA 25.0 wt % in HBM Examples 10.0 wt % in PGMEA PGMEA/1-butanolsolvent Ex. 9 2.250 g 2.700 g 10.05 g

TABLE 2-6 Metal Hardmask Formulation Based on 30/70 (w) HEMA/tBA BinderPolymer and TYZOR AA-105, using Alcohol as a Major Solvent 30/70 (w) TAGHEMA/tBA TYZOR AA-105 TEA pTS 2-methyl- 39.8 wt % 25.0 wt % in 2- 5 wt %1-butanol Examples in MIBC methyl-1-butanol in HBM Solvent Ex. 10 3.5176g  16.800 g 0 19.68 g Ex. 11 3.342 g 15.960 g 1.366 g 19.33 g Ex. 123.241 g 15.480 g 2.120 g 15.16 g

TABLE 2-7 Metal Hardmask Formulations Based on 30/70 (w) HEMA/MMA BinderPolymer and TYZOR AA-105 30/70 (w) HEMA/MMA TYZOR AA-105 PGMEA Examples10.0 wt % in PGMEA 20.0 wt % in PGMEA Solvent Ex. 13 5.813 g 0 4.919 gEx. 14 4.065 g 0.6667 g  5.268 g Ex. 15 3.557 g 1.750 g 4.693 g Ex. 163.049 g 4.500 g 2.451 g Ex. 17 2.541 g 7.083 g 0.376 g

IV. Overview—Preparation of the Spin Coat—Hardmask

For Solvent Stripping Test, Etch Test, and Thermal Stability Test:wafer—bare silicon wafers from WaferNet Inc., diameter of 8 inch;thickness of 0.7 mm. No pre-treatment.

For lithography study: wafer—bare silicon wafers from WaferNet Inc.,diameter of 12 inch; thickness of 0.7 mm. No pre-treatment

Each hardmask formulation was filtered through a “0.2 μm pore size” TFPEsyringe filter, before each test.

The spin coating for the Solvent Stripping Test, the Etch Test, and theThermal Stability Test was performed using TEL, ACT 2 Track with manualdispensing (using 1.5 to 2.5 ml of a formulation for each coating).

1) Solvent Stripping Test—each hardmask formulation was spin coated ontoa wafer at 1500 RPM, followed by an optional post coating bake at 105°C. for 60 seconds, and then by a curing bake at a desired temperaturefor 60 seconds. The coated wafer was then brought to a coating bowl,where a solvent was slowly dispensed on the wafer to form a puddle. Thepuddle was held for 90 seconds, before spinning off the solvent. Thefilm thickness of the metal hardmask was measured before and after the“solvent stripping test,” using a THERMA-WAVE Spectroscopic EllipsometerModel 7341. The change in film thickness, before and after thestripping, indicates the solvent resistance of a metal hardmask.

2) Etch Test—each hardmask formulation was spin coated onto a wafer at1500 RPM, as discussed above, and then cured at 250° C. for 60 seconds.After the metal hardmask film was cured, the cured film was etched usinga PLASMA-THERM 790 RIE system, using a specified power (90 W for O₂ etchand 50 W for CF₄ etch) and etch time. The film thickness, before andafter etch, was measured. The etch rate for each metal hardmask film wascalculated using the “total film thickness loss” and the etch time.

3) Thermal Stability Test—each hardmask formulation was spin coated ontoa wafer at 1500 RPM, followed by an optional post coating bake at 105°C. for 60 seconds, and then by a curing bake at a desired temperaturefor 60 seconds. Next, the cured metal hardmask film was heated at 250°C., for 600 seconds (10 minutes), and the film thickness change duringthis heating process was measured, and used to indicate the thermalstability of the film. For typical electronic applications, a metalhardmask film should not to lose more than 5% of its film thickness.

4) Lithography Test was used to test the bottom antireflective coating(BARC) property of the metal hardmask. See Table 26 below for theprocess conditions. In this test, a metal hardmask was tested in a dualBARC stack, by replacing the bottom BARC in the stack with an inventivemetal hardmask. The lithography performance of the stack containing theinventive metal hardmask was compared to the original dual BARC stack.

V. Solvent Strip Test—Overview

See the overview for the “solvent strip test” discussed above.Optionally, after solvent stripping, the wafer was brought back to a hotplate, and baked at 105° C. for 60 second (post strip back). The filmthickness was then measured again. This optional baking was to removeabsorbed solvent in the film.

Study a: Organometal as a Cross-Linker (Strip Test)

To test the cross-linking function of an organometal, the resistance tosolvent stripping for films, cured at different curing temperatures, wasdetermined using film thickness loss during a “90 sec single puddle”PGMEA striping. A detailed test flow is outlined in Table 3 below(FT=Film Thickness).

TABLE 3 A Process Flow for a Solvent Strip Test Spin coating 1500 rpmcuring bake 125, 150, 175, 200, 225° C., 60 sec FT measurement noted as“initial” PGMEA strip 90 sec single puddle FT measurement noted as “poststrip” post strip bake 105° C., 60 sec FT measurement noted as “poststrip bake”

Two samples (Examples 1 and 2) were tested. Both samples contain 2.0 wt% total solid (polymer binder+organometal), and they differ only in theratio of polymer binder to organometal as summarized in Table 4 below.

TABLE 4 Formulations for Examples 1 and 2 with Different Binder toOrganometal Ratio Binder/ Binder Diluent Organometal Sample PolymerOrganometal Solvent Wt Ratio Ex. 1 30/70 TYZOR PGMEA 50/50 HEMA/MMAAA-105 Ex. 2 30/70 TYZOR PGMEA 25/75 HEMA/MMA AA-105

It was discovered that, although solvent resistance was stronger for ahigher cure temperature, cross-linking did take place at the lowest curetemperature, 125° C., as indicated by the PGMEA stripping results shownin FIGS. 1A and 1B (Ex. 1 is depicted in FIG. 1A and Ex. 2 is depictedin FIG. 1B). In FIGS. 1A and 1B, the film thickness was measure beforethe strip test (initial), after the strip test (post strip), and aftersubjecting the stripped film to a post strip bake (post strip bake).

The refractive indices (at 673 nm wavelength) of the coated films werefound to steadily increase with curing temperature for both samples,indicating that the metal levels are higher in the films cured at highertemperatures. Shown in FIG. 2 are the “refractive indices versus curetemperatures.” As seen in this figure, the sample (Ex. 1) with morebinder polymer (binder to organometal ratio is 50/50) had a lowercorresponding refractive index at each curing temperature, as comparedto the sample (Ex. 2) which had a lower binder to organometal ratio(25/75).

In a follow-up test, one additional sample (Ex. 3) was prepared with anincrease total solid content of 6.0 wt %, by keeping the same 25/75binder/organometal ratio as Ex. 2. The PGMEA stripping test followed thesame test flow as outlined in Table 3 above, but with curingtemperatures of 225 and 250° C., respectively. Results are shown in FIG.3. In FIG. 3, the film thickness was measure before the strip test(initial), after the strip test (post strip), and after subjecting thestripped film to a post strip bake (post strip bake).

It has been discovered, as shown in FIGS. 1A, 1B and 3, that the filmthickness of the cured films significantly shrinks with the increase inthe curing temperature. This is believed to be due to a cross-linkingreaction between the binder polymer and the organometal, and among theorganometal themselves by condensing out alcohol species. Of course,evaporation of free organometal in a film cured at a higher temperaturemay contribute, to a certain extent, to the film shrinkage.

It has been discovered that a post coating bake at 105° C., used betweenthe spin coating and the curing bake steps, can be used to reduce thepotential of evaporation of free organometal compound. Shown in FIG. 4are film thickness values before PGMEA striping and after post stripbake. In FIG. 4, the film thickness was measure before the strip test(initial), and after subjecting the stripped film to a post strip bake(post strip bake). Comparing FIGS. 3 and 4, one can see a slightimprovement in film thickness retention is achieved with a post coatingbake at 105° C. inserted between spin coating and curing bake.

The samples in FIGS. 1A, 1B and 3 were not subject to the post coatingbake at 105° C. for 60 seconds. The sample in FIG. 4 was subject to thispost coating bake.

Study B (Strip Test)

An additional strip test was conducted on hardmask formulations formedfrom “30/70 (w) HEMA/tBA” as a binder polymer. It has been discoveredthat the tert-butyl group on tBA is both acid and heat labile at thetemperature examined. After the tert-butyl group leaves, a carboxylicacid functional group is created on the binder polymer, which reactswith organometal compound, and thus helps retain the organometal in thefilm. In this test set, two samples, Ex. 4 and Ex. 5, were formulatedwith a solid content (binder+organometal) of 6 wt %, and with, andwithout, a thermal acid generator (TAG) as shown in Table 5. Ex. 4 andEx. 5 were subject to the post coating bake at 105° C. for 60 seconds.The test flow conditions are shown in Table 6 below. The results fromthe strip test are shown in Table 7 below.

TABLE 5 Formulations using 30/70 HEMA/tBA as a Binder Polymer and TYZORAA-105 as an Organometal Compound Ex. 4 Ex. 5 30/70 HEMA/tBA, 10 wt % inPGMEA 2.250 g 2.250 g TYZOR AA-105, 10 wt % in PGMEA 6.750 g 6.750 g TAGTEA pTS, 5 wt % in HBM — 1.440 g PGMEA  6.00 g  4.56 g

TABLE 6 Process Conditions for the Stripping Test Spin coating 1500 rpmPost coating bake 105° C., 60 sec curing bake 250° C., 60 sec FTmeasurement noted as “initial” PGMEA strip 90 sec single puddle FTmeasurement noted as “post strip” post strip bake 105° C., 60 sec FTmeasurement noted as “post strip bake” (FT = Film Thickness)

TABLE 7 The Strip Test Results for Ex. 4 and Ex. 5 - Film Thickness (inÅ) Before PGMEA Strip (Initial), After Strip (Post Strip) and After PostStrip Bake Exp. 4 Exp. 5 initial 350.4 461.9 post strip 351 463.5 poststrip bake 346.1 455.7 reflective index @673 nm 1.6482 1.6605

In this study, improved film retention was achieved as compared to theprevious study for a formulation with the same solid(binder+organometal) content. Moreover, the formulation with TAG (Ex. 5)further improves film retention (initial and post strip filmthicknesses).

Study C (Strip Test)

Poly(HEMA) was used in this study. Poly(HEMA) is not soluble in PGMEA,and therefore, it was synthesized in HBM, and used “as is.” In theformulation, HBM was used as a sole solvent, as seen in Table 8 below.The solid content (binder+organometal) in the formulation is 6.0 wt %.

TABLE 8 Formulation for Ex. 6 using Poly(HEMA) as Binder Polymer andTYZOR AA-105 as the Organometal. Ex. 6 Poly(HEMA), 14.7 wt % in HBM1.531 g TYZOR AA-105, 10 wt % in HBM 6.750 g HBM solvent  6.72 g

The process flow is summarized in Table 9 below. Here, HBM was used asthe stripping solvent rather than PGMEA, since the binder polymer inthis study was not soluble in PGMEA but in HBM. Additionally, one filmwas subject to a post coating bake at 105° C. for 60 seconds, while theother film was not subject to the post coating bake. The filmthicknesses, before and after HBM solvent stripping, and after poststripping bake, are shown in Table 10 below.

TABLE 9 A Process Flow for the Stripping Test using HBM as the StrippingSolvent Spin coating 1500 rpm Post coating bake 105° C./60 sec, or nobake curing bake 250° C., 60 sec FT measurement noted as “initial” HBMstrip 90 sec single puddle FT measurement noted as “post strip” poststrip bake 105° C., 60 sec FT measurement noted as “post strip bake”

TABLE 10 Film Thickness (in Å) of Formulation Ex. 6, Before and AfterHBM Solvent Stripping, and After Post Stripping Bake, and With andWithout Post Coating Bake Ex. 6 with post Ex. 6 without post coatingbake coating bake initial 893.9 871.8 post strip 896.5 874.6 post stripbake 886.8 866.6 reflective index @673 nm 1.6215 1.6196

With the same (6 wt %) total solid (binder+organometal) content as Ex.4, the film thickness of Ex. 6 is significantly increased (from 350 to894 Å). This increase in film thickness is not only because of increasednumber of hydroxy groups that promote cross-linking between the binderpolymer and the organometal, but also because of the increased solutionviscosity due to HBM solvent. For the films of Example 6, the film withpost coating bake is thicker than the film without this bake step.

Study D (Use Different Organometal)

In this study, the binder polymer, “30/70 (w) HEMA/IPGMA,” was used inthe formulations, along with organometal compound, AA-105-IPG. Bothmaterials are acid labile, and upon baking, hydroxy groups aregenerated. These generated hydroxy groups on binder polymer and onorganometal compound further react with organometal compound duringbaking, to help retain the organometal in a coated film.

Two formulations were made with TAG, and both formulations contain 6 wt% solid (bonder+organometal). TYZOR AA-105 was used in one formulation,and AA-105-IPG was used in another formulation. The detailedformulations are listed in Table 11. Both examples Ex. 7 and Ex. 8formed excellent films with film thickness of 517 and 456, respectively.

TABLE 11 Formulations for Ex. 7 and Ex. 8. Ex. 7 Ex. 8 30/70 HEMA/IPGMAStock 2.250 g 2.250 g AA-105-IPG stock solution 6.750 g — TYZOR AA-105stock solution — 6.750 g TAG TEA pTS stock solution 1.440 g 1.440 gPGMEA  4.56 g  4.56 g

Study E (Strip Test—Zirconium Butoxide)

Zirconium butoxide was used in this study with “30/70 (w) HEMA/MMA” as abinder polymer. The detailed formulation is given in Table 12 below. Thetest conditions are shown in Table 13. Ex. 9 was subject to the “105C/60 sec post coating bake.” A similar test flow to Study B was used,but with a higher curing temperature of 350° C. for 90 seconds.

TABLE 12 Metal Hardmask Formulation Based on 30/70 HEMA/MMA BinderPolymer and Zirconium Butoxide Organometal Zirconium butoxide 30/70HEMA/MMA 25.0 wt % in HBM Examples 10.0 wt % in PGMEA PGMEA/1-butanolsolvent Ex. 9 2.250 g 2.700 g 10.05 g

TABLE 13 Process Conditions for the Stripping Test Spin coating 1500 rpmPost coating bake 105° C., 60 sec curing bake 350° C., 90 sec FTmeasurement noted as “initial” PGMEA strip 90 sec single puddle FTmeasurement noted as “post strip” post strip bake 105° C., 60 sec FTmeasurement noted as “post strip bake” (FT = Film Thickness)

The film thicknesses before and after PGMEA strip, and after strip bake,are listed in Table 14. Again, excellent resistance to solvent isobserved for this zirconium based organometal compound.

TABLE 14 Film Thicknesses (Å) of Ex. 9 Before (Initial) and After (postStrip) PGMEA Strip, and After Strip Bake (Post Strip Bake) Exp. 9initial 613.6 post strip 614.6 post strip bake 611.5 reflective index@673 nm 1.537

Study F (Strip Test—Alcohol Solvent)

Formulations with alcohol as a major solvent were studied. The “30/70(w) HEMA/tBA” synthesized in MIBC, was used as the binder polymer. TYZORAA-105 was used as the organometal compound, and 2-methyl-1-butanol wasused as the major solvent in the formulations. The formulations furthercontain different levels of TAG. Shown in Table 15 are the detailedformulations for a curing temperature study. Ex. 10 contained 14.0 wt %solid (binder+organometal), Ex. 11 contained 13.3 wt % solid, and Ex. 12contained 12.9 wt % solid. The coated films were cured at 350° C. for 90seconds, using the test conditions shown in Table 16. These exampleswere subject to the “105 C/60 sec post coating bake.” The filmthicknesses are shown in Table 17.

TABLE 15 Metal Hardmask Formulation Based on 30/70 (w) HEMA/tBA BinderPolymer and TYZOR AA-105 using Alcohol as a Major Solvent 30/70 (w) TAGHEMA/tBA TYZOR AA-105 TEA pTS 2-methyl- 39.8 wt % 25.0 wt % in 2- 5 wt %1-butanol Examples in MIBC methyl-1-butanol in HBM solvent Ex. 10 3.5176g  16.800 g 0 19.68 g Ex. 11 3.342 g 15.960 g 1.366 g 19.33 g Ex. 123.241 g 15.480 g 2.120 g 15.16 g

TABLE 16 Process Conditions for the Stripping Test Spin coating 1500 rpmPost coating bake 105° C., 60 sec curing bake 350° C., 90 sec FTmeasurement noted as “initial” PGMEA strip 90 sec single puddle FTmeasurement noted as “post strip” post strip bake 105° C., 60 sec FTmeasurement noted as “post strip bake” (FT = Film Thickness)

TABLE 17 Film thicknesses (Å) of Ex. 10, 11 and 12 before and afterPGMEA strip and after strip bake Exp. 10 Exp. 11 Exp. 12 initial 642.7635.7 634.9 post strip 643.9 635.7 637.8 post strip bake 643.2 635.2637.6

As seen in Table 17, excellent solvent resistance is demonstrated by allthese three formulations

When tested at different curing temperatures, following test conditionsshown in Table 18, these three formulations (Exs. 10-12) exhibitedexcellent solvent resistance across the curing temperature used (seeFIGS. 5A (Ex. 10), 5B (Ex. 11) and 5C (Ex. 12)). The refractive indicesof cured films were found to increase dramatically with the increase ofcuring temperature. See FIG. 6 for Ex. 10

TABLE 18 Process Conditions for the Stripping Test Spin coating 1500 rpmPost coating bake 105° C., 60 sec curing bake 150, 200, 250 and 350° C.,for 60 sec FT measurement noted as “initial” PGMEA strip 90 sec singlepuddle FT measurement noted as “post strip” post strip bake 105° C., 60sec FT measurement noted as “post strip bake” (FT = Film Thickness)

VI. Thermal Stability—Overview

Thermal stability of a cured metal hardmask film was measured by thechange in film thickness before and after a baked at 250° C. for 10minutes. A film thickness change of less than, or equal to, 5% isacceptable.

Study A: 30/70 (w) HEMA/MMA with TYZOR AA-105

In this study, Ex. 3 was tested by curing it at 350° C. for 60 and 90seconds, respectively. The detailed test flow, including the postcoating bake, is listed in Table 19. The film thicknesses before andafter a “250° C./10 min bake” are listed in Table 20 below.

TABLE 19 Process Conditions for the Stripping Test Spin coating 1500 rpmPost coating bake 105° C., 60 sec curing bake 350° C., for 60 sec or 90sec FT measurement noted as “before” Thermal stability test bake 250°C., for 10 min FT measurement noted as “after” (FT = Film Thickness)

TABLE 20 Film Thicknesses (Å) of Ex. 3 Before and After 250° C./10 minBake Cured at 350° C., Cured at 350° C., Ex. 3 for 60 sec for 90 secbefore 234.8 205.7 after 229.6 202.3 % change 2.21% 1.65%

Excellent thermal stability was demonstrated with this formulation whencured at 350° C., for either 60 or 90 seconds.

Study B: 30/70 (w) HEMA/tBA with TYZOR AA-105

In this study, Ex. 10, Ex. 11 and Ex. 12 were tested using the same testflow as outlined in Table 19 above, but for curing at 350° C., for 60seconds only. The film thicknesses, before and after coated films werebaked at 250° C., for 10 minutes, are summarized in Table 21 below.Excellent thermal stability was demonstrated with these threeformulations with and without a TAG.

TABLE 21 Film Thicknesses (Å) of Ex. 3 Before and After 250° C./10 minBake Ex. 3 Ex. 10 Ex. 11 Ex. 12 before 694.2 686.5 735.4 after 671.7664.2 710.9 % change 3.24% 3.25% 3.33%

VII. Etch Resistance—Overview

Etch resistance of a cured metal hardmask was evaluated by the change infilm thickness before and after etched, in a given time frame, using aspecified etch chemistry. In this test, both O₂ and CF₄ etch gasses wereused, with a etch power of 90 W and 50 W, respectively. Etch time was 10to 30 seconds, depending on the test film thickness. The etch tool was aPLASMA-THERM 790 RIE, which contained a sample holder for the coatedwafer (sample size (0.5 in×1 in) cut from a whole wafer). The filmthickness before and after etch was measured using amicrospectrophotometer NANOSPEC AFT 2100 from Nanometrics.

Study A: Enhanced Etch Resistance with Increased Organometal Level in aFilm

In this study, samples with different levels of TYZOR AA-105 wereformulated with the “30/70 (w) HEMA/MMA” binder polymer, as summarizedin Table 22. Solvent in these formulations was PGMEA. The formulationsare detailed in Table 23 below.

TABLE 22 Formulations with Different Levels of TYZOR AA-105. Ex. 13 Ex.14 Ex. 15 Ex. 16 Ex. 17 Binder con- 5.0 wt % 4.0 wt % 3.5 wt % 3.0 wt %2.5 wt % tent in formulation (wt % based on weight of formulation) TYZOR0 25/70 50/50 75/25 85/15 AA-105/ binder wt ratio

TABLE 23 Formulation Detailed for Ex. 13 Through Ex. 17. Ex. 13 Ex. 14Ex. 15 Ex. 16 Ex. 17 30/70 HEMA/MMA, 5.088 g 4.064 g 3.556 g 3.047 g2.541 g 10.0 wt % in PGMEA TYZOR AA-105, 0 0.667 g 1.727 g 4.517 g 7.080g 20 wt % in PGMEA PGMEA 4.919 g 5.225 g 4.687 g 2.564 g 0.376 g

Each sample was spin coated on a bare silicon wafer at 1500 rpm,followed by a post coating bake at 105° C. for 60 seconds, and thencured at 250° C. for 60 seconds. The etch rates of these coated filmswere determined using a PLASMA-THERM 790 RIE system with a etching powerof 90 w for O₂ etch (for 30 seconds) and 50 w for CF₄ etch (for 25seconds). Results are summarized in Tables 24 and 25.

TABLE 24 Film Thickness (Å) Before and After O₂ Etch O₂ Etch Results Ex.13 Ex. 14 Ex. 15 Ex. 16 Ex. 17 Initial FT, Å 289 292 371 574 788 FTafter 30 s O₂ Etch, Å 0 111 276 535 739 O₂ Etch Rate, Å/sec >28.9 6.03.2 1.3 1.6

TABLE 25 Film Thickness (Å) Before and After CF₂ Etch CF₄ Etch ResultsEx. 13 Ex. 14 Ex. 15 Ex. 16 Ex. 17 Initial FT, Å 289 292 371 574 788 FTafter 25 s CF₄ Etch, 167 167 283 525 734 Å CF₄ Etch Rate, Å/sec 4.9 5.03.5 2.0 2.2

As seen from Tables 24 and 25, a significant decrease in etch rate wasobtained with incorporation of TYZOR AA-105 in the coated film. It wasdiscovered that, unlike “Si-containing films,” the inventive films cansustain CF₄ etch, and therefore an etch selectivity can be createdbetween the inventive films and the “Si-containing films,” such as asilicon hardmask or a SiARC. In addition, this group of samples showedan increasing trend in refractive indices at 673 nm wavelength withincreasing organometal levels in the coated film, as shown in FIG. 7(EXS. 13-16).

VIII. Metal Hardmask Lithography Test

The lithography test was used to test the bottom antireflective coating(BARC) property of the metal hardmask. In this test, an inventive metalhardmask was tested in a dual BARC stack, by replacing the bottom BARCin the stack with the metal hardmask. Lithography performance wascompared between the original dual BARC stack and the stack with theinventive metal hardmask. The lithography processing conditions arelisted in Table 26 below. For lithography test, the samples wereprocessed on an ASML 1900i Immersion Scanner in conjunction with a CLEANTRACK LITHIUS. The small volume dispensing device was a TRDACK. Thedispensing volume for each layer was 1 to 3 ml. The spin speed wasaround 1500 RPM to obtain the target film thicknesses. AR26N is anbottom antireflective coating available from Dow Electronic Materials.AR137 is an bottom antireflective coating available from Dow ElectronicMaterials.

TABLE 26 Processing Conditions for Metal Hardmask Ex. 11 LithographyTest BARC 1 AR26N Ex. 11 thickness* 760 Å 730 Å bake temp, time 205° C.,60 sec 350° C., 60 sec BARC 2 AR137 AR137 thickness* 200 Å 200 Å baketemp, time 205° C., 60 sec 205° C., 60 sec Resist EPIC2096 EPIC2096thickness* 1100 Å 1100 Å soft bake temp, time 120° C., 60 sec 120° C.,60 sec Top Coat OC2000 OC2000 thickness* 314 Å 314 Å bake temp, time 90°C., 60 sec 90° C., 60 sec Illumination Dipole 35-Y Dipole 35-YPolarization X X NA 1.35 1.35 Outer Sigma 0.96 0.96 Inner Sigma 0.760.76 *Thickness of individual layer

This lithography test was for imaging “42 nm 1:1 line-space” patternsusing EPIC 2096 resist (available from Dow Electronic Materials). Inthis test, OC 2000 immersion top coat (available from Dow ElectronicMaterials) was also used. An ASML 1900i scanner at a maximum scan speedof 650 mm/sec was used. Shown in FIG. 8 are “critical dimension (CD)versus dose (exposure energy)” plots for the stack with the Ex. 11 metalhardmask and the stack of the original dual BARC system.

The following test results: E_(size) (exposure energy for printing thetarget “42 nm 1:1 line-space”), energy latitude (EL) and patterncollapse margin (PCM), are summarized in Table 27.

TABLE 27 Summary Table for Litho Performance Dual BARC Stack with Ex. 11Esize, mJ/cm² 25.9 24.1 EL, % 24.4 24.4 PCM, nm 34.5 34.5

As seen in Table 27, the stack containing the BARC formed from Ex. 11had a similar performance, compared to the stack containing the originaldual BARC system. The “CD through dose,” at best focus, for “42 nm/84nm” pitch lines is shown in FIG. 9. A direct comparison for the imagesat Esize (energy for printing the target CD, 42 nm in this test) andbest focus, is shown in FIG. 10 below.

A slightly improved LWR was seen for the stack with Ex. 11 as the bottomB ARC. Esize for the stack with Ex. 11 was slightly reduced as observedin this test. Overall, similar lithography performance was achieved withformulation Ex. 11 in a dual BARC stack, as compared to the originaldual BARC stack.

1. A composition comprising at least the following A and B: A) a polymercomprising, in polymerized from, at least one “monomer that comprises atleast one hydroxyl group;” and B) an organometal compound comprising atleast one metal selected from Ti, Zr, Hf, Co, Mn, Zn, or combinationsthereof, and wherein the organometal compound is present in an amountgreater than 5 weight percent, based on the sum weight of A and B. 2.The composition of claim 1, wherein the polymer of component A comprisesless than 1 weight percent silicon, based on the weight of the polymer.3. The composition of claim 1, wherein component A is present in anamount greater than 20 weight percent, based sum weight of A and B. 4.The composition of claim 1, wherein component B is present in an amountless than 80 weight percent, based sum weight of A and B.
 5. Thecomposition of claim 1, wherein the polymer of component A comprisesfrom 5 to 100 weight percent of the “monomer that comprises at least onehydroxyl group” based on the weight of the polymer.
 6. The compositionof claim 1, wherein the “monomer that comprises at least one hydroxylgroup” is selected from HEMA, OH-styrene, or combinations thereof. 7.The composition of claim 1, wherein the “monomer that comprises at leastone hydroxyl group” is selected from a hydroxy acrylate monomer or ahydroxy alkyl acrylate monomer.
 8. The composition of claim 1, whereinthe polymer further comprises an acrylate monomer or an alkyl acrylatemonomer.
 9. The composition of claim 1, wherein the organometal compoundis chelated with at least two oxygen atoms.
 10. The composition of claim1, wherein the organometal compound is selected from Ti, Zr, orcombinations thereof.
 11. The composition of claim 1, wherein theorganometal compound is selected from the following compounds:

or combinations thereof, and wherein R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7 and R8are each independently selected from the following: i) hydrocarbongroup, ii) a substituted hydrocarbon group, iii) a hydrocarbon groupcontaining at least one heteroatom in its backbone, or iv) a substitutedhydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatom in its backbone;and wherein R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19 and R20are each independently selected from the following: i) a hydrogen atom,ii) a hydrocarbon group, iii) a substituted hydrocarbon group, iv) ahydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatom in its backbone, orv) a substituted hydrocarbon group containing at least one heteroatom inits backbone.
 12. A chelated metal compound formed from the compositionof claim 1, and comprising at least one ligand derived from the polymerof component A.
 13. An article comprising at least one component formedfrom the composition of any of claim
 1. 14. The article of claim 13,wherein the article is an electronic device.
 15. A method of forming acoated substrate, said method comprising at least the following: a)applying the composition of claim 1 over at least a portion of thesubstrate, b) thermally treating the composition to form the coating.